The International Labor Organization defines forced labor as "all work or service which is exacted from any person under the threat of a penalty and for which the person has not offered himself or herself voluntarily." Also relevant to this enforcement domain are child labor and human trafficking violations. Several U.S. agencies have strong mandates and authorities to prevent products manufactured by forced labor from entering the commerce of the United States.
The U.S. Department of Labor, through the Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) maintains a “public a list of goods from countries that ILAB has reason to believe are produced by forced labor or child labor in violation of international standards, including, to the extent practicable, goods that are produced with inputs that are produced with forced labor or child labor.” [See Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA of 2005)]. As of September 2022, the ILAB’s TVPRA List contains 159 goods from 78 countries and areas.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) plays an important role in preventing the entry of goods into the U.S. made by forced/child labor: Section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307) authorizes CBP to issue Withhold Release Orders (WRO) to prevent merchandise produced using forced labor from being imported into the United States. The WRO is a CBP order that prevents imports from entering the U.S. due to “reasonable but not conclusive” evidence that forced labor was used in the overseas production of the goods. CBP may detain and/or seize goods. The importer of record is required to provide proof that the goods they are importing are not manufactured using forced labor.
CBP has significantly increased forced labor enforcement actions through WROs since the The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) was enacted on December 23, 2021. The UFLPA establishes a rebuttable presumption covering the import of any goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) of the People’s Republic of China.
The rebuttable presumption standard means CBP will treat all goods produced entirely or in part in the XUAR as if they were produced with forced labor, and therefore, prohibited from entering the U.S. pursuant to Section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Critically, this places the burden of proof on the importer of record to show that the goods were not manufactured using forced labor.
Just as the Department of Labor maintains its forced labor TVPRA List, the Department of Homeland Security maintains the UFLPA Entity List for entities that have produced goods in XUAR using forced labor; have worked with Xinjiang government entities to use forced labor; have exported into the U.S. products made with forced labor; or have sourced materials from Xinjiang or entities working with Xinjiang.
In addition to government issued lists and controls, NGOs have been very active in providing research and intelligence on forced labor violations, including Chinese entities associated with the XUAR.
Finally, in addition to the DOL, DHS and NGO lists, the Department of Commerce has added XUAR entities onto its Commerce’s entity list - “This action targets these entities’ ability to access commodities, software, and technology subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), and is part of a U.S. Government-wide effort to take strong action against China’s ongoing campaign of repression against Muslim minority groups in the XUAR.”
The U.S. government, European Union as well as other critical trade partners have increasingly recognized forced labor as a “pervasive and pernicious element of the global marketplace.” Consequently, several statutes and regulations have been implemented in the U.S. to address forced labor throughout the global supply chain. Companies that do not perform effective due diligence and know your customer (KYC) checks for their global trade transactions are at risk for violating these statutes and supporting forced labor. The following summarizes some of the reasons why forced labor risk compliance is important:
There are multiple forced labor statutes and regulations that need to be complied with and failure to do so can lead to severe criminal penalties and civil fines.
The primary import statutes and regulations are listed below, but the trade community should be aware that several other statutes pertaining to money laundering, conspiracy, and false statements can and often are additionally charged for egregious violations:
BITE is a tool suite that assists companies in multiple domains to reduce risk in their supply chain. Our AI technology assists companies to remain on the right side of compliance through cost-effective, easy-to-use tools.
This document covers information and processes to assist companies understand the risks involved with forced labor compliance.
The BITE Playbook, available in the BITE app, helps you navigate these regulatory requirements and quickly understand which agencies enforce what regulations associated with your specific transaction.
BITE Data: our BITE Playbook maps directly to watchlists, Harmonized Schedule codes and commodity screening lists, allowing you to quickly check a commodity or person against the extensive filters in our platform.
Training Modules: Gets access to concise, easy-to-follow tutorials and guidelines.
In this article we provide further insight into our analysis of ROSOBORONEKSPORT’, a Russia’s only state-controlled intermediary in
In this month's edition, Nu Borders analyzed Russian import and export trade manifest data...
In this month's edition, NU Borders analyzed Russian Import and Export trade manifest data utilizing the Harmonized Tariff Schedule to identify...